Sunday, March 18, 2007

PARODY IS NOT DEFAMATION UNDER INDIANA LAW




Last month, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided an interesting defamation case that involved a personal attack on a website. Although the Court did not use the terminology, it appears that the website involved was probably what is typically referred to as a "blog" these days.

According to the Court's opinion, Paul Hamilton is a businessman in Daviess County, Indiana. He owns and operates a business known as Hamilton Water Conditioning there. Morgan Prewitt and his wife are also residents of Daviess County.

At some point prior to June of 2002, Prewitt allegedly began operating a website entitled "Paul Hamilten--The World's Smartest Man." Although there was a one-letter difference between "Hamilten" and "Hamilton," Mr. Prewett never denied that he was the author of the website, or that it was intended to refer to Paul Hamilton and his business. The website portrayed "Hamilten" as a manipulative and dishonest individual. For example, the website stated:

I am a very intelligent, older American male and have my own very successful business dealing with the water conditioning field. I have a Master's Degree in Water Conditioning from Smartass University, a prestigious mail order college. While I am somewhat attractive, I am known for my ability to seduce women with my quick wit. I have several methods of attracting women as well as socializing skills, which are in the book I am writing...

*******

When my employees are installing a unit at a place where their [sic] is a woman at home, I like to get the target alone and tell her that she doesn't have to "pay for this." A couple of winks and boom, you have another sucker hooked. Please note that this only works on women that have half a brain, the more intelligent ones.

*******

I began stocking water in large five gallon containers. To turn over the water stock supply and maintain fresh water, I began selling the oldest containers as bottled water.....No one is smart enough to test the water for free sodium ions, they will never know it's just softened water in the containers.


The Court's opinion goes on to give several more examples of the claims that were made in the website.

When Paul Hamilton learned about the website, he filed a lawsuit against Prewitt for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Special Judge of the Daviess Superior Court granted summary judgment to Prewett, and Hamilton then appealed.

Judge John Baker wrote the opinion for the Court of Appeals of Indiana. After noting that this was a case of first impression--meaning that it presented an issue not previously decided by our appellate courts-- Judge Baker affirmed the decision of the trial court.

Initially, the Court considered the nature of the law of defamation as it has developed in Indiana. The law of defamation was created to protect individuals from reputational attacks. A defamatory communication is defined as one that "tends so to harm the reputation of another as to lower him in estimation of the community or to deter a third person from associating or dealing with him."

In order to prevail in a case for defamation, a plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) a communication with defamatory imputation; (2) malice; (3) publication; and (4) damages. To impose liability for defamation, a false statement of fact is required.

While Indiana has ample case law dealing with defamation, this appears the first case dealing with parody. In adopting language from other jurisdictions, the Court noted that, "Parody involves exaggeration or distortion and is the means by which the author clearly indicates to his audience that the piece does not purport to be a statement of fact but is rather an expression of criticism or opinion.....The satiric effect emerges only as the reader concludes by the very outrageousness of the words that the whole thing is a put-on. The comic effect is achieved because the reader sees the words as the absurd expression of positions or ideas associated with the purported author."

The key to the Court's decision appears to lie in the fact that there are no believable false statements of fact contained within the website. From reading the Court's opinion I believe that, if the website had contained actual false statements of fact rather than mere parody, the Court would not have upheld the summary judgment. In this regard, the Court cautioned: " By finding parody and defamation to be mutually exclusive, we are not suggesting that language cannot be defamatory if it is also humorous. A defendant who couches a defamatory imputation of fact in humor cannot simply avoid liability by dressing his wolfish words in humorous sheep's clothing."

This final distinction by the Court is crucial. We should all realize that a false statement about someone else is actionable, even if it is phrased in a humorous fashion.

I believe that this is a well-reasoned and sound decision. If you would like to read the whole opinion, the case is Hamilton v. Prewett, 860 N.E.2d 1234 (Ind. App. 2007).





6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

One must remember that the entire publication must be considered and not just in part. Hamilton moved to transfer the appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court who refused to hear the case. Hamilton threatened to take it to the US Supreme Court in an article in our local paper.

There is a lot more to the story that isn't published. Nor was the entire website entered into evidence by the plaintiff, only what he considered to be the most actionable, in my opinion.

I would like to point out that it wasn't my wife included in the suit as the decision states, it was my mother. I think the reason that she was included was due to the fact that I am considered judgment proof because my sole income is SS Disability, and the plaintiff was looking for deep pockets. She had nothing to do with the site and was dissmissed from the complaint by a motion from the plaintiff.

I did not intend any harm, I was just poking a little fun at the guy. Had I wanted to be hurt his business, I would have said his water caused the consumer to suffer detrimental effects rather than becoming more intelligent or better looking. I did learn that some folks can dish it out but certainly can't take it.

The depositions tell more than any other documentation about this lawsuit.

Thanks!

11:44 AM  
Blogger chenlina said...

chenlina20160227
the north face
marc jacobs handbags
oakley sunglasses
coach outlet
cheap toms
ugg boots
longchamp outlet
abercrombie and fitch
louis vuitton outlet
christian louboutin outlet
louis vuitton handbags
uggs outlet
oakkey sunglasses
coach outlet
coach factory outlet
ugg outlet
louis vuitton outlet
fitflops
oakley sunglasses outlet
michael kors outlet
louis vuitton
toms outlet
air max uk
louis vuitton
burberry outlet
chanel handbags
replica rolex watches
toms wedges
louis vuitton outlet
coach outlet online
cheap ray ban sunglasses
true religion jeans
coach outlet store online
ugg outlet
toms shoes
louis vuitton
oakley sunglasses
cheap uggs
coach factory outlet
abercrombie outlet
as

1:21 AM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

louis vuitton outlet, nike air max, louis vuitton, replica watches, burberry handbags, longchamp outlet, ugg boots, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet online, michael kors outlet, ray ban sunglasses, nike outlet, jordan shoes, louis vuitton outlet, prada handbags, prada outlet, cheap oakley sunglasses, longchamp outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet online, michael kors outlet online, michael kors outlet online, oakley sunglasses, kate spade outlet, ugg boots, oakley sunglasses wholesale, chanel handbags, louis vuitton outlet, nike air max, christian louboutin uk, christian louboutin outlet, tiffany and co, oakley sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, uggs outlet, christian louboutin, polo outlet, uggs on sale, longchamp outlet, gucci handbags, replica watches, christian louboutin shoes, tory burch outlet, nike free, louis vuitton, tiffany jewelry, burberry outlet, uggs outlet

11:03 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

nike free run, vans pas cher, ralph lauren uk, hollister uk, burberry pas cher, hollister pas cher, north face uk, michael kors, polo lacoste, nike air max uk, timberland pas cher, nike air force, nike tn, nike free uk, true religion outlet, sac vanessa bruno, nike air max uk, ray ban uk, coach outlet store online, lululemon canada, ray ban pas cher, longchamp pas cher, true religion outlet, replica handbags, true religion jeans, nike blazer pas cher, air max, michael kors, oakley pas cher, coach purses, michael kors outlet, converse pas cher, sac hermes, coach outlet, polo ralph lauren, sac longchamp pas cher, nike air max, north face, guess pas cher, hogan outlet, true religion outlet, jordan pas cher, mulberry uk, new balance, nike roshe run uk, nike roshe, kate spade, louboutin pas cher, abercrombie and fitch uk, michael kors pas cher

11:07 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

qzz0524
uggs outlet
moncler outlet
canada goose outlet
cheap jordans
nike factory outlet
coach outlet
coach outlet
nike shoes
bottega veneta outlet
air jordan 12

7:02 PM  
Blogger jeje said...

coach factory outlet
off white outlet
true religion
ugg boots clearance
clarks shoes
ugg boots outlet
canada goose outlet
true religion jeans
christian louboutin outlet
christian louboutin

5:53 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home